Take a look at the Recent articles

Risk of obesity on adult male fertility in Gaza Strip, the Palestinian Authority

Maged M. Yassin

Faculty of Medicine, The Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine

E-mail : bhuvaneswari.bibleraaj@uhsm.nhs.uk

Said S. Alghora

Faculty of Medicine, The Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine

Tarik Z. El-Refi

Faculty of Health Sciences, The Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine

Mohammed M. Yasin

Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Cairo, Egypt

DOI: 10.15761/TiM.1000260

Article
Article Info
Author Info
Figures & Data

Abstract

Background/aim: Globesity and/ or fertility are intricate multifactorial phenomena, environmentally, genetically, physiologically and behaviorally determined, thus an interdisciplinary approach is required to understand. This study assessed the risk of obesity on Palestinian male fertility in terms of reproductive hormonal profile and semen parameters, and their associations with body mass index (BMI).

Materials and methods: This study was a case-control design and comprised 80 obese and 80 non-obese adult males matched for age. The BMI was measured. Lipid profile, testosterone, gonadotropins and semen parameters were determined.

Results: Significant increase in the BMI of obese males compared to non-obese male controls (33.4 ± 2.5 vs. 22.8 ± 1.5 kg/m2, P<0.001). Cholesterol, triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were also significantly increased in obese males (P<0.001). Testosterone showed significant decrease in obese males than non-obese group (3.6 ± 1.5 vs. 6.3 ± 0.8 ng/ml, P<0.001) whereas luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) showed significant increase in obese males (9.7 ± 5.3 and 12.3 ± 6.4 vs. 4.7 ± 2.6 and 4.6 ± 1.3 mIU/ml, P<0.001, respectively). Sperm concentration, motility and normal form were significantly lower in obese males compared to non-obese controls whereas immotile and abnormal sperm form were significantly higher in obese males. The BMI showed significant positive correlation with cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, LH, FSH, immotile and abnormal sperm form, while significant negative correlation was found with testosterone, sperm concentration, motility and normal form.

Conclusion: The relationship of obesity with lipid profile, reproductive hormones and semen parameters suggests that improvement of fertility may be targeted throughout weight-loss health programs for obese males.

Key words

obesity, male fertility, reproductive hormones, semen parameters, Gaza Strip

Introduction

Obesity is a condition of abnormal or excess fat accumulation in adipose tissue, to the extent that health may be impaired [1]. Many diseases are associated with obesity that include cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and malignancies [2-4]. Obesity is not a single disorder but a heterogeneous group of conditions with multiple etiologies of an intricate interplay of environmental and genetic factors each of which is ultimately expressed as obese phenotype [5]. The BMI is a simple index that commonly used to classify underweight, overweight and obese in adults. It is defined as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters [6]. An adult person with a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 is considered by World Health Organization (WHO) to have a normal weight, while obesity is defined as having a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or more [7].

The epidemiology of obesity has been reached alarming levels, affecting virtually both developed and developing countries. In the majority of European countries, the prevalence of obesity was increased from 10% to 40% in the last decade, and specifically in England, it increased more than three-folds [8]. In USA, the prevalence of obesity in adults was 42.4% in 2017-2018 [9]. The Arab countries showed adult obesity trends of 23.0% to 46.0% [10,11]. In the Palestinian territories including Gaza Strip, the prevalence of obesity in adults ranged from 18% to 30% [12].

Fertility is the natural capability to produce offspring. As a measure, the total fertility rate identifies the average number of children per woman if a group of women were to experience the age-specific fertility rates for a given year [13]. The primary reproductive organs of the male are the testes, which have both an exocrine (sperm producing) and an endocrine (testosterone producing) functions [14]. Impeccable coordination of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis is required for normal testicular function. Pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) by the hypothalamus stimulates the biosynthesis of pituitary gonadotropins, LH and FSH that, in turn, sustain intragonadal testosterone production and spermatogenesis [15].

Over the last two decades, obesity is linked to human fertility. Although a growing body of research has indicated the potential role of obesity in the deterioration of male fertility, yet the underlying mechanisms of obesity-induced male infertility have not been fully understood. However, obesity may act through alteration in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and its cross talks with other hormones, thus impairing the intricate orchestration of prime endocrine regulators (LH and FSH) of male reproduction [16]. Importantly, obesity and its underlying mediators result in a negative impact on semen parameters, including sperm concentration, motility, viability and normal morphology [17]. In addition, obesity is combined with general metabolic derangements including lipid profile abnormalities that affect negatively on testicular function [18].

In Gaza Strip, most of the published research on obesity is limited and has been focused on epidemiological surveys and few related biochemical aspects. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study linked obesity with adult male fertility. Therefore, this study is the first to assess the risk of obesity on male fertility in terms of hormonal profile and semen quantity and quality, and their associations to obesity in Gaza Strip, Palestine.

Materials and methods

Study population and experimental design

This study used a case-control design. The study population included 160 individuals based on evaluation of obesity among adult males aged 20-40 years old in Gaza Strip. Cases comprised 80 obese males with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and equal number non-obese males with BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 apparently healthy individuals as a control group. Cases and controls were age matched. Smoker men and men with diabetes mellitus, testicular disease or testicular surgery and family history of infertility were excluded.

Sampling and sample size

The case group was married obese men visiting obesity clinics in Gaza Strip seeking for weight control and the control group included married normal weight men. The sample size calculations were based on the formula for case-control studies. EPI-INFO statistical package version 3.5.1 was used with 95% CI, 80% power and 50% proportion as conservative and OR > 2. The sample size in case of 1:1 ratio of case control was found to be 71:71. For a no-response expectation, the sample size was increased to 80 obese men. The control group was also consisted of 80 non-obese men.

Ethical consideration

The necessary approval to conduct this study was obtained from Helsinki committee for ethical approval number PHRC/HC/27/12 in the Gaza Strip and all study participants signed an informed consent form.

Questionnaire interview

A face to face interview was used for filling in a mini questionnaire. The questions were one of two types: the yes/no question, which offers a dichotomous choice; and the multiple choice question, which offers several fixed alternatives [19]. The questionnaire was validated and piloted, and included questions on age, have children, education, employment and family income/month.

Body mass index

The body weight and height of each individual dressed in light clothing without shoes were measured using a carefully calibrated balance (Detecto, CAP-180 Kg, USA) for weight and a vertical measuring rod for height, and the BMI was calculated as Kilogram (kg) body mass/height in meter squared [7].

Blood sampling and processing

Twelve hours overnight fasting venous blood samples were collected in vacutainer tubes. Blood was left for a while without anticoagulant to allow blood to clot. Then, serum samples were obtained by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes using a Rotina 46 Hettich Centrifuge, Japan.

Biochemical analysis

Serum cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by the cholesterol oxidase/POD method and by the glycerol phosphate oxidase/POD method, respectively, using the BioSystems kit, Spain [20,21]. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was determined by the precipitating method using Labkit kit, Spain [22]. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was calculated using the empirical relationship of Friedewald [23]. Serum testosterone, LH and FSH were determined according to the methods of Tietz, Lenton et al. and Vitt et al. [24-26], respectively using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) TECO kits.

Semen collection and analysis

Semen samples were collected by masturbation in sterile polypropylene containers after sexual abstinence of 2-7 days. Semen volume was measured. Routine semen analysis was carried out by light microscopy. The concentration, motility and morphology of spermatozoa were assessed according to WHO criteria [27].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS software version 23.0 for windows (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Inc, Chicago, Illinois). A Simple distribution of the study variables and cross tabulation was applied. Chi-square (χ2) was used to identify the difference between variables. Yates’s continuity correction test, χ2(corrected), was used when not more than 20% of the cells had an expected frequency of less than five and when the expected numbers were small. The independent sample t-test procedure was used to compare means of quantitative variables by the separated cases into two qualitative groups such as the relationship between testosterone levels of non-obese and obese males. Pearson's correlation test was applied. The results were accepted as statistically significant when P<0.05. The percentage difference was calculated according to the formula: Percentage difference equals the absolute value of the change in value, divided by the average of the 2 numbers, all multiplied by 100.

Percentage difference=(|(V1 - V2)|/((V1+V2)/2))×100.

Results

Socio-demographic aspects and anthropometric measurements

Table 1 showed no significant differences between obese and non-obese males in terms of age and education (P > 0.05). However, significant differences were found between obese and non-obese males, with less number of children (χ2(corrected) test=4.329, P=0.037), lower number of employee (χ2=5.479, P=0.019) and less family income/month (χ2=20.486, P=<0.001) among obese group. As indicated in Table 2, BMI in obese male was significantly higher compared to non-obese males (33.4 ± 2.5 vs. 22.8 ± 1.5 kg/m2, % difference=37.7, P<0.001).

Table 1. Socio-demographic aspects of the study population

Character

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

Test

P-value

Age (year)

31.7 ± 5.6

31.7 ± 6.1

t=0.000

1.000

Have children

Yes

No

80 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

74 (92.5)

6 (7.5)

χ2=4.329

0.037*

Education

University

Secondary school

Preparatory school

Primary school

18 (22.5)

54 (67.5)

8 (10.0)

0 (0.0)

22 (27.5)

42 (52.5)

10 (12.5)

6 (7.5)

χ2=5.708

  

0.127*

Employment

Yes

No

34 (42.5)

46 (57.5)

20 (25.0)

60 (75.0)

χ2=5.479

0.019

Family income/month (NIS)

< 1000

1000-2000

> 2000

8 (10.0)

36 (45.0)

36 (45.0)

30 (37.5)

34 (42.5)

16 (20.0)

χ2=20.486

< 0.001

NIS: new Israeli Shekel (~ 0.27 $US).

Values are n (%) except age where values are expressed as means ± SD.

*P-value of χ2(corrected) test; P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: not significant.

Table 2. Anthropometric measurements of the study population

Anthropometric measurement

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

% difference

t-value

P-value

Weight (kg)

(min-max)

76.8 ± 7.8

59.1-93.7

112.6 ± 11.1

90.0-132.1

37.8

16.595

< 0.001

Height (m)

(min-max)

1.83 ± 0.06

1.68-1.94

1.82 ± 0.08

1.67-1.96

0.5

0.235

0.815

BMI (kg/m2)

(min-max)

22.8 ± 1.5

18.9-24.8

33.4 ± 2.5

30.0-40.6

37.7

22.443  

< 0.001

kg: Kilogram; m: Meter; BMI: Body mass index: People with BMI=18.5-24.9 were considered to have normal weight and people with BMI ≥ 30.0 were classified obese (WHO, 2020).

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD).

P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: Not significant.

Biochemical parameters

Lipid profile of obese compared to non-obese males is illustrated in Table 3. The mean levels of cholesterol (212.6 ± 42.4 vs. 127.9 ± 38.4 mg/dl), triglycerides (230.9 ± 30.7 vs. 113.8 ± 35.6 mg/dl) and LDL-C (121.7 ± 32.8 vs. 93.9 ± 22.9 mg/dl) were significantly higher in obese males compared to non-obese controls (P<0.001), with % differences of 49.8, 67.9 and 25.8, respectively. On the other hand, no significant difference was found in HDL-C among obese and non-obese males. Hormonal analysis presented in Table 4 revealed significant decrease in the mean level of testosterone in obese males than non-obese group (3.6 ± 1.5 vs. 6.3 ± 0.8 ng/ml, % difference=54.5 and P<0.001). Conversely, the mean levels of LH and FSH were significantly increased in obese males (9.7 ± 5.3 and 12.3 ± 6.4 vs. 4.7 ± 2.6 and 4.6 ± 1.3 mIU/ml, % differnces=69.4 and 91.1, P<0.001, respectively).

Table 3. Lipid profile of the study population

Parameter

(mg/dl)

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

% difference

t-value

P-value

Cholesterol

(min-max)

127.9 ± 38.4

65-195

212.6 ± 42.4

94-303

49.8

9.320

< 0.001

Triglycerides

(min-max)

113.8 ± 35.6

53-184

230.9 ± 30.7

144-292

67.9

15.750

< 0.001

HDL-C

(min-max)

52.7 ± 5.4

45-63

51.9 ± 4.0

45-59

1.5

0.918

0.360

LDL-C

(min-max)

93.9 ± 22.9

53-143

121.7 ± 32.8

49-178

25.8

4.390

< 0.001

HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD).

P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: Not significant.

Table 4. Hormonal level of the study population

Hormone

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

% difference

t-value

P-value

Testosterone (ng/ml)

(min-max)

6.3 ± 0.8

4.3-7.0

3.6 ± 1.5

1.0-8.0

54.5

10.190

< 0.001

LH (mlU/ml)

(min-max)

4.7 ± 2.6

2.0-13.0

9.7 ± 5.3

1.2-26.8

69.4

5.290

< 0.001

FSH (mlU/ml)

(min-max)

4.6 ± 1.3

2.6-9.7

12.3 ± 6.4

1.8-37.0

91.1

7.117

< 0.001

LH: Luteinizing hormone; FSH: Follicle stimulating hormone.

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD).

P<0.05: Significant.

Semen parameters

Table 5 summarizes semen parameters in obese and non-obese males. Sperm concentration including sperm volume (2.2 ± 0.9 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6 ml), sperm count (7.8 ± 5.2 vs. 43.7 ± 16.0 million/ml) and total sperm count (17.6 ± 21.6 vs. 135.3 ± 55.8 million) were significantly lower in obese males compared to non-obese controls (P<0.001), with % differences 34.0, 139.5 and 15.4, respectively). Sperm motility showed significant decrease in total motility (28.7 ± 14.8 vs. 57.7 ± 11.2%, P<0.001), Fast progressive (0.23 ± 1.27 vs. 18.9 ± 5.4%, P<0.001) and slow progressive (18.7 ± 11.6 vs. 28.7 ± 7.5%, P<0.001) in obese males than non-obese controls, with % differences of 67.0, 195.3 and 42.1, respectively. In contrast, immotile sperms were significantly higher in obese males (71.3 ± 14.8 vs. 42.4 ± 11.2%, % difference=50.9 and P<0.001). However, no significant difference was found in non-progressive motility among obese and non-obese males. Sperm morphology showed significantly lower normal forms (25.9 ± 4.7 vs. 39.0 ± 4.6%, P<0.001) whereas abnormal forms were significantly higher (74.1 ± 4.7 vs. 61.0 ± 4.6%, P<0.001) in obese males with respect to controls, with % differences of 40.5 and 19.5, respectively.

Table 5. Semen parameters of the study population

Parameter

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

% Difference

t-value

P-value

Sperm concentration

Volume (ml)

(min-max)

3.1 ± 0.6

2.0-4.5

2.2 ± 0.9

0.8-5.5

34.0

5.353

< 0.001

Count (million/ml)

(min-max)

43.7 ± 16.0

23.0-83.0

7.8 ± 5.2

1.5-25.0

139.5

13.550

< 0.001

Total count (million)

(min-max)

135.3 ± 55.8

9.0-294.0

17.6 ± 21.6

3.2-137.5

15.4

12.440

< 0.001

Sperm motility

Total motility (%)

(min-max)

57.7 ± 11.2

40-80

28.7 ± 14.8

4-66

67.0

9.861

< 0.001

Fast progressive (%)

(min-max)

18.9 ± 5.4

10-40

0.23 ± 1.27

0-8

195.3

21.150

< 0.001

Slow progressive (%)

(min-max)

28.7 ± 7.5

15-40

18.7 ± 11.6

0-50

42.1

4.560

< 0.001

Non-progressive (%)

(min-max)

10.1 ± 4.5

2-22

9.8 ± 4.7

2-28

2.8

0.269

 0.789

Immotile (%)

(min-max)

42.4 ± 11.2

20-60

71.3 ± 14.8

34-96

50.9

9.860

< 0.001

Sperm morphology

Normal form (%)

(min-max)

39.0 ± 4.6

30-51

25.9 ± 4.7

12-38

40.5

12.680

< 0.001

Abnormal form (%)

(min-max)

61.0 ± 4.6

49-70

74.1 ± 4.7

62-88

19.5

12.630

< 0.001

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD).

P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: Not significant.

Body mass index in relation to the study parameters

As indicated in Table 6, Pearson correlation test displayed significant positive correlations of BMI with cholesterol (r=0.737, P=<0.001), triglycerides (r=0.836, P<0.001), LDL-C (r=0.493, P<0.001), LH (r=0.445, P<0.001), FSH (r=0.492, P<0.001), immotile sperm (r=0.738, P<0.001) and abnormal sperm form (r=0.759, P<0.001), while significant negative correlation was found with testosterone (r=- 0.755, P<0.001), sperm concentration in terms of volume (r=- 0.465, P<0.001), count (r=- 0.774, P<0.001) and total count (r=- 0.742, P<0.001), sperm motility in terms of total motility (r=- 0.738, P<0.001), fast progressive (r=- 0.856, P<0.001) and slow progressive (r=- 0.494, P<0.001), and normal sperm form (r=- 0.759, P<0.001).

Table 6. The correlation of BMI with the study parameters

Parameter

BMI (kg/m2)

P-value

Pearson's correlation (r)

Lipid profile

Cholesterol (mg/dl)

0.737

< 0.001

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

0.836

< 0.001

HDL-C (mg/dl)

-0.034

0.693

LDL-C (mg/dl)

0.493

< 0.001

Hormone

Testosterone (ng/ml)

-0.755

< 0.001

LH (mlU/ml)

0.445

< 0.001

FSH (mlU/ml)

0.492

< 0.001

Sperm cocentration

Volume (ml)

-0.465

< 0.001

Count (million/ml)

-0.774

< 0.001

Total count (million)

-0.742

< 0.001

Sperm motility

Total motility (%)

-0.738

< 0.001

Fast progressive (%)

-0.856

< 0.001

Slow progressive (%)

-0.494

< 0.001

Non-progressive (%)

-0.064

0.573

Immotile (%)

0.738

< 0.001

Sperm morphology

Normal form (%)

-0.759

< 0.001

Abnormal form (%)

0.759

< 0.001

HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LH: Luteinizing hormone; FSH: Follicle stimulating hormone.

P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: not significant.

Discussion

Obesity is a modern day epidemic complex multifactorial disease, with genetic, behavioral, socioeconomic, and environmental origins, that greatly raises risk of chronic disease morbidity; namely disability, depression, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, certain cancers, and mortality. The worldwide prevalence of overweight and obesity (Globesity) has doubled since 1980 to an extent that nearly a third of the world's population is now classified as overweight or obese [28]. In the last twenty years, particular attention has been paid to the effect of obesity on male fertility. However, the mechanisms underlying this effect still need to be clarified. Reproductive hormones and semen parameters may vary in obese compared to non-obese males resulting in impairment of fertility. This research is aimed to evaluate testosterone, LH, FSH, semen parameters in terms of quantity and quality as well as lipid profile, and their correlations with BMI in obese and non-obese Palestinian adult males.

The present study showed significant differences between non-obese and obese males, with less number of children, lower number of employee and less family income/month among obese group. The negative impact of obesity on male fertility is expected to be reflected in having a lower number of children [17]. Regarding employment, Tunceli and his colleagues found that obesity is associated with reduced employment [29]. In other words, a significant negative association between obesity and employment was reported [30]. The more frequent obesity with less family income was previously documented [31]. The inability of low income families to afford healthy food may be a major contributor to the increase prevalence of obesity [32].

The BMI was significantly higher in obese males compared to non-obese control group. This finding coincides with that obtained by other authors [33,34]. The BMI is the metric measure currently in use for defining anthropometric height/weight characteristics in adults and for categorizing them into groups [35]. Obesity is defined as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that may impair health and the presence of a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 [7]. Therefore, the BMI is widely adopted as an index of obesity. In general, obesity results from an energy imbalance caused by eating too many calories and not getting enough exercise [36]. It has been accepted that exercise is essential for the management of obesity [37].

The mean levels of cholesterol, triglyceride and LDL-C were significantly increased in obese compared to non-obese males. Significant positive correlations were also found between BMI with total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-C. Similar results were achieved in the literature [34,38]. Dyslipidemia in obese males is mainly attributed to insulin resistance that develops in obese individuals. In such circumstances, there is an increase in the mobilization of free fatty acids from fat depots, since insulin inhibits the hormone sensitive lipase. Excess serum fatty acids are converted into triglycerides, phospholipids and cholesterol in liver which may be discharged into blood [39,40].

Hormonal analysis revealed significant decrease in the mean level of testosterone in obese males than non-obese group. Conversely, the mean levels of LH and FSH were significantly increased in obese males. A significant negative correlation was found between BMI with testosterone whereas significant positive correlations with LH and FSH. This means that obesity is associated with the disturbance of reproductive hormones and subsequently impose a deleterious impact on male fertility. Such findings are in agreement with that reported earlier [41,42]. Increase levels of LH and FSH in obese men is more likely to be due to negative feedback control excreted by low testosterone level on hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis [43,44]. Significant alterations and correlations of testosterone, LH and FSH with BMI may explain the role of such tri-hormonal interplay in subfertility of obese men. However, fertility is a complex phenomenon, partly physiologically and partly behaviorally determined, thus an interdisciplinary approach is required to understand it.

Semen parameters in terms of quantity and quality were altered in obese compared to non-obese control males. Sperm concentration, motility and normal sperm form were significantly lower while immotile and abnormal sperm form were significantly higher in obese males. The BMI showed a significant positive correlation with immotile and abnormal sperm form and a significant negative correlation with sperm concentration, motility and normal sperm form. These results in combination with reproductive hormonal disturbance do confirm the potential risk of obesity on male fertility. Many authors showed such alterations of semen parameters in obese men [42,45,46]. Obesity may negatively affect sperm count and sperm characteristics through several interfered and intricate possible mechanisms including: 1) impaired Sertoli cells function and spermatogenesis [47], 2) increased scrotal temperature due to the increased scrotal adiposity, which may damage spermatogenesis and impair semen parameters [42], 3) increased production of reactive oxygen species and inflammatory mediators impairing testicular and epididymal tissues [48], 4) accumulation of toxic substances and liposoluble endocrine disruptors in fat tissue [47], 5) epigenetic changes including methylation of sperm DNA, nuclear protein composition and modification of non-coding RNA [49], and 6) elevation of leptin levels which have negative associations with testosterone levels and sperm parameters and positive associations with FSH and LH levels and abnormal sperm morphology [50]. The last speculation is supported by decreased levels of testosterone concurrent with increased levels of FSH and LH in obese males that presented in this study. Finally, this research accumulates further evidence on obesity-induced male subfertility and/or infertility in terms of having a deleterious effect on reproductive hormones as well as on semen parameters.

In conclusion obesity is associated with lipid profile, testosterone, gonadotropins, semen parameters and BMI in Palestinian adult males. Serum cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, LH, FSH, immotile and abnormal sperm form were significantly increased whereas testosterone, sperm concentration, motility and normal form were significantly decreased with BMI increase. Frequent monitoring of lipid profile is necessary for obesity, and testosterone, LH, FSH and semen parameters are very important test for male fertility. Therefore, obese males with high lipid profile, LH and FSH as well as with low testosterone levels and altered semen parameters are highly encouraged for weight-loss diet and/or exercise to improve their fertility.

Declaration of conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shekharappa KR, Johncy SS, Mallikarjuna PT, Vedavathi KJ, Jayarajan MP (2011) Correlation between body mass index and cardiovascular parameters in obese and non obese in different age groups. International Journal of Biological & Medical Research 2: 551-555.
  2. Arnold M, Leitzmann M, Freisling H, Bray F, Romieu I, et al. (2016) Obesity and cancer: An update of the global impact. Cancer Epidemiology 41: 8-15.
  3. Chobot A, Górowska‐Kowolik K, Sokołowska M, Jarosz‐Chobot P (2018) Obesity and diabetes—Not only a simple link between two epidemics. Diabetes Metabolism Research and Reviews 34: e3042.
  4. Hingorani AD, Finan C, Schmidt AF (2020) Obesity causes cardiovascular diseases: adding to the weight of evidence. European Heart Journal 41: 227-230.
  5. Qasim A, Turcotte M, de Souza RJ, Samaan MC, Champredon D, et al. (2018) On the origin of obesity: identifying the biological, environmental and cultural drivers of genetic risk among human populations. Obesity Reviews 19: 121-149.
  6. Gupta S, Kapoor S (2014) Body adiposity index: Its relevance and validity in assessing body fatness of adults.
  7. World Health Organization (2020). Obesity, Fact sheet: obesity and overweight key facts. Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. [accessed 18 November 2020].
  8. Agha M, Agha R (2017) The rising prevalence of obesity: part A: impact on public health. International Journal of Surgery 2: e17.
  9. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL (2020) Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States, 2017-2018. CDC, NCHS Data Brief, No. 360. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db360-h.pdf.
  10. Lemamsha H, Randhawa G, Papadopoulos C (2019) Prevalence of overweight and obesity among Libyan men and women. BioMed Research International 2019: 8531360.
  11. Samara A, Andersen PT, Aro AR (2019) Health promotion and obesity in the Arab Gulf States: challenges and good practices. Journal of Obesity 2019: 4756260.
  12. Elessi K, Albaraqouni L (2019) Prevalence of obesity and overweight in Palestine: a systematic review. The Lancet.
  13. Hartnett CS (2016) Fertility rates. Encyclopedia of Family Studies 1: 1-5.
  14. Fietz D, Bergmann M (2017) Functional anatomy and histology of the testis. In: Simoni M, Huhtaniemi I. (Eds.), Endocrinology of the testis and male reproduction. Endocrinology, Springer, Cham., Switzerland, pp: 313-341.
  15. Corradi PF, Corradi RB, Greene LW (2016) Physiology of the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis in the male. Urologic Clinics of North America 43: 151-162.
  16. Agarwal A, Dutta S (2020) Obesity, in: Parekattil S, Esteves S, Agarwal A. (Eds.), Male Infertility. Springer, Cham., Switzerland, pp: 497-508.
  17. Leisegang K, Sengupta P, Agarwal A, Henkel R (2020) Obesity and male infertility: Mechanisms and management. Andrologia 2020: e13617.
  18. Pushpendra A, Jain GC (2015) Hyperlipidemia and male fertility: A critical review of literature. Andrology 4: 141.
  19. Backstrom C, Hursh-César G (2012) Survey Research, Pennsylvania, United States: Literary Licensing, LLC.
  20. Meiatlini F, Prencipe L, Bardelli F, Giannini G, Tarli P (1978) The 4-hydroxybenzoate/4aminophenazone chromogenic system used in the enzymic determination of serum cholesterol. Clinical Chemistry 24: 2161-2165.
  21. Bucolo G, David H (1973) Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by use of enzymes. Clinical Chemistry 19: 476-482.
  22. Grove TH (1979) Effect of reagent pH on determination of HDL cholesterol by precipitation with sodium phosphotungstate-magnesium. Clinical Chemistry 25: 560-564.
  23. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS (1972) Estimation of the concentration of LDL-C in plasma without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical Chemistry 18: 499-502.
  24. Tietz NW (1986) Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. Philadelphia, USA, WB Saunders Company.
  25. Lenton EA, Sulaiman R, Sobowale O, Cooke ID (1982) The human menstrual cycle: Plasma concentrations of prolactin, LH, FSH, oestradiol and progesterone in conceiving and non-conceiving women. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 65: 131-139.
  26. Vitt UA, Kloosterboer HJ, Rose UM, Bete S, Nayudu PL (1998) Human follicle-stimulating hormone isoform fractions differentially affect both the development of in vitro grown ovarian follicles and the subsequent maturation capacity of the oocytes. Biology of Reproduction 58: 209.
  27. World Health Organization (2010)‎ WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th ed. Website: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44261. [accessed 18 November, 2020].
  28. Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F (2019) The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism 92: 6-10.
  29. Tunceli K, Li K, Williams LK (2016) Long-term effects of obesity on employment and work limitations among U.S. adults, 1986 to 1999. Obesity 14: 1637-1646.
  30. Lindeboom M, Lundborg P, van der Klaauw B (2010) Assessing the impact of obesity on labor market outcomes. Economics and Human Biology 8: 309-319.
  31. Markwick A, Vaughan L, Ansari Z (2013) Opposing socioeconomic gradients in overweight and obese adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 37: 32-38.
  32. Akil L, Ahmad HA (2011) Effects of socioeconomic factors on obesity rates in four southern states and Colorado. Ethnicity and Disease 21: 58-62.
  33. Shi H, Jiang B, Sim J, Chum Z, Bin Ali N, et al. (2014) Factors associated with obesity: a case-control study of young adult Singaporean males. Military Medicine 179: 1158-1165.
  34. Mwafy SN, Yassin MM, Mousa RM (2020) Thyroid function, metabolic parameters and anthropometric changes among Palestinian obese adult females. Obesity Medicine 17: 100159.
  35. Nuttall FQ (2015) Body mass index: Obesity, BMI, and health: A critical review. Nutrition Today 50: 117-128.
  36. Mwafy SN, Yassin MM, Mousa RM (2018) Thyroid hormones, lipid profile and anthropometric changes after programmed weight loss in Palestinian obese adult females. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome 12: 269-273.
  37. Kim B, Choi D, Jung C, Kang S, Mok J, et al. (2017) Obesity and physical activity. Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome 26: 15-22.
  38. Shabana S, Shahid SU, Sarwar S (2020) The abnormal lipid profile in obesity and coronary heart disease (CHD) in Pakistani subjects. Lipids in Health and Disease 19: 73.
  39. Jung UJ, Choi MS (2014) Obesity and its metabolic complications: the role of adipokines and the relationship between obesity, inflammation, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15: 6184-6223.
  40. Yassin MM, Abu Mustafa AM, Abujami SM, Jaber EA (2017) Leptin status and biochemical parameters in type 2 diabetic males from Gaza strip. Annals of Medical and Biomedical Sciences 3: 4-10.
  41. Fui MN, Dupuis P, Grossmann M (2014) Lowered testosterone in male obesity: mechanisms, morbidity and management. Asian Journal of Andrology 16: 223-231.
  42. Maghsoumi-Norouzabad L, Zare Javid A, Aiiashi S, Hosseini SA, Dadfar M, et al. (2020) The Impact of obesity on various semen parameters and sex hormones in Iranian men with infertility: A cross-sectional study. Research and Reports in Urology 12: 357-365.
  43. Martini AC, Molina RI, Tissera A, Ruiz RD, Cuneo MF (2013) The impact of obesity on male reproduction: Its biological significance. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism 8: 139-148.
  44. Mermer M, Akdevelioğlu Y (2018) The role of obesity in male fertility. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology 7: 3435-3440.
  45. Wang E, Huang Y, Du Q, Yao G, Sun Y (2017) Body mass index effects sperm quality: a retrospective study in Northern China. Asian Journal of Andrology 19: 234-237.
  46. Ramaraju GA, Teppala S, Prathigudupu K, Kalagara M, Thota S, et al. (2018) Association between obesity and sperm quality. Andrologia 50: 3.
  47. Bellastella G, Menafra D, Puliani G, Colao A, Savastano S (2019) How much does obesity affect the male reproductive function? International Journal of Obesity Supplements 9: 50-64.
  48. Bhattacharya K, Sengupta P, Dutta S, Karkada IR (2020) Obesity, systemic inflammation and male infertility. Chemical Biology Letters 7: 92‐98.
  49. Craig JR, Jenkins TG, Carrell DT, Hotaling JM (2017) Obesity, male infertility, and the sperm epigenome. Fertility and Sterility 107: 848-859.
  50. Khodamoradi K, Parmar M, Khosravizadeh Z, Kuchakulla M, Manoharan M, et al. (2020) The role of leptin and obesity on male infertility. Current Opinion in Urology 30: 334-339.

Editorial Information

Editor-in-Chief

Ying-Fu Chen
Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan

Article Type

Research Article

Publication history

Received date: September 25, 2020
Accepted date: October 12, 2020
Published date: October 15, 2020

Copyright

©2020 Yassin MM. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Yassin MM, Alghora SS, El-Refi TZ, Yasin MM (2020) Risk of obesity on adult male fertility in Gaza Strip, the Palestinian Authority. Trends Med 20: DOI: 10.15761/TiM.1000260

Corresponding author

Maged M. Yassin

Faculty of Medicine, The Islamic University of Gaza, P.O. Box 108, Gaza Strip, Palestine

E-mail : bhuvaneswari.bibleraaj@uhsm.nhs.uk

Table 1. Socio-demographic aspects of the study population

Character

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

Test

P-value

Age (year)

31.7 ± 5.6

31.7 ± 6.1

t=0.000

1.000

Have children

Yes

No

80 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

74 (92.5)

6 (7.5)

χ2=4.329

0.037*

Education

University

Secondary school

Preparatory school

Primary school

18 (22.5)

54 (67.5)

8 (10.0)

0 (0.0)

22 (27.5)

42 (52.5)

10 (12.5)

6 (7.5)

χ2=5.708

  

0.127*

Employment

Yes

No

34 (42.5)

46 (57.5)

20 (25.0)

60 (75.0)

χ2=5.479

0.019

Family income/month (NIS)

< 1000

1000-2000

> 2000

8 (10.0)

36 (45.0)

36 (45.0)

30 (37.5)

34 (42.5)

16 (20.0)

χ2=20.486

< 0.001

NIS: new Israeli Shekel (~ 0.27 $US).

Values are n (%) except age where values are expressed as means ± SD.

*P-value of χ2(corrected) test; P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: not significant.

Table 2. Anthropometric measurements of the study population

Anthropometric measurement

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

% difference

t-value

P-value

Weight (kg)

(min-max)

76.8 ± 7.8

59.1-93.7

112.6 ± 11.1

90.0-132.1

37.8

16.595

< 0.001

Height (m)

(min-max)

1.83 ± 0.06

1.68-1.94

1.82 ± 0.08

1.67-1.96

0.5

0.235

0.815

BMI (kg/m2)

(min-max)

22.8 ± 1.5

18.9-24.8

33.4 ± 2.5

30.0-40.6

37.7

22.443  

< 0.001

kg: Kilogram; m: Meter; BMI: Body mass index: People with BMI=18.5-24.9 were considered to have normal weight and people with BMI ≥ 30.0 were classified obese (WHO, 2020).

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD).

P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: Not significant.

Table 3. Lipid profile of the study population

Parameter

(mg/dl)

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

% difference

t-value

P-value

Cholesterol

(min-max)

127.9 ± 38.4

65-195

212.6 ± 42.4

94-303

49.8

9.320

< 0.001

Triglycerides

(min-max)

113.8 ± 35.6

53-184

230.9 ± 30.7

144-292

67.9

15.750

< 0.001

HDL-C

(min-max)

52.7 ± 5.4

45-63

51.9 ± 4.0

45-59

1.5

0.918

0.360

LDL-C

(min-max)

93.9 ± 22.9

53-143

121.7 ± 32.8

49-178

25.8

4.390

< 0.001

HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD).

P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: Not significant.

Table 4. Hormonal level of the study population

Hormone

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

% difference

t-value

P-value

Testosterone (ng/ml)

(min-max)

6.3 ± 0.8

4.3-7.0

3.6 ± 1.5

1.0-8.0

54.5

10.190

< 0.001

LH (mlU/ml)

(min-max)

4.7 ± 2.6

2.0-13.0

9.7 ± 5.3

1.2-26.8

69.4

5.290

< 0.001

FSH (mlU/ml)

(min-max)

4.6 ± 1.3

2.6-9.7

12.3 ± 6.4

1.8-37.0

91.1

7.117

< 0.001

LH: Luteinizing hormone; FSH: Follicle stimulating hormone.

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD).

P<0.05: Significant.

Table 5. Semen parameters of the study population

Parameter

Non-obese male

(n=80)

Obese male

(n=80)

% Difference

t-value

P-value

Sperm concentration

Volume (ml)

(min-max)

3.1 ± 0.6

2.0-4.5

2.2 ± 0.9

0.8-5.5

34.0

5.353

< 0.001

Count (million/ml)

(min-max)

43.7 ± 16.0

23.0-83.0

7.8 ± 5.2

1.5-25.0

139.5

13.550

< 0.001

Total count (million)

(min-max)

135.3 ± 55.8

9.0-294.0

17.6 ± 21.6

3.2-137.5

15.4

12.440

< 0.001

Sperm motility

Total motility (%)

(min-max)

57.7 ± 11.2

40-80

28.7 ± 14.8

4-66

67.0

9.861

< 0.001

Fast progressive (%)

(min-max)

18.9 ± 5.4

10-40

0.23 ± 1.27

0-8

195.3

21.150

< 0.001

Slow progressive (%)

(min-max)

28.7 ± 7.5

15-40

18.7 ± 11.6

0-50

42.1

4.560

< 0.001

Non-progressive (%)

(min-max)

10.1 ± 4.5

2-22

9.8 ± 4.7

2-28

2.8

0.269

 0.789

Immotile (%)

(min-max)

42.4 ± 11.2

20-60

71.3 ± 14.8

34-96

50.9

9.860

< 0.001

Sperm morphology

Normal form (%)

(min-max)

39.0 ± 4.6

30-51

25.9 ± 4.7

12-38

40.5

12.680

< 0.001

Abnormal form (%)

(min-max)

61.0 ± 4.6

49-70

74.1 ± 4.7

62-88

19.5

12.630

< 0.001

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD).

P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: Not significant.

Table 6. The correlation of BMI with the study parameters

Parameter

BMI (kg/m2)

P-value

Pearson's correlation (r)

Lipid profile

Cholesterol (mg/dl)

0.737

< 0.001

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

0.836

< 0.001

HDL-C (mg/dl)

-0.034

0.693

LDL-C (mg/dl)

0.493

< 0.001

Hormone

Testosterone (ng/ml)

-0.755

< 0.001

LH (mlU/ml)

0.445

< 0.001

FSH (mlU/ml)

0.492

< 0.001

Sperm cocentration

Volume (ml)

-0.465

< 0.001

Count (million/ml)

-0.774

< 0.001

Total count (million)

-0.742

< 0.001

Sperm motility

Total motility (%)

-0.738

< 0.001

Fast progressive (%)

-0.856

< 0.001

Slow progressive (%)

-0.494

< 0.001

Non-progressive (%)

-0.064

0.573

Immotile (%)

0.738

< 0.001

Sperm morphology

Normal form (%)

-0.759

< 0.001

Abnormal form (%)

0.759

< 0.001

HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LH: Luteinizing hormone; FSH: Follicle stimulating hormone.

P<0.05: Significant; P>0.05: not significant.