Take a look at the Recent articles

Prehypertension

Muharrem Said Coşgun

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey

E-mail : bhuvaneswari.bibleraaj@uhsm.nhs.uk

Hüsnü Değirmenci

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey

Eftal Murat Bakırcı

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey

Hasan Ölmez

Department of Chest Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey

DOI: 10.15761/HPC.1000202

Article
Article Info
Author Info
Figures & Data

Abstract

According to The Seventh Report published in 2003 by the Joint National Committee (JNC 7), patients with systolic blood pressure of 120-139 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of 80-89 mmHg are diagnosed with prehypertension. Prehypertension defined in different terms in different guidelines. Prehypertension often coexists with comorbidities such as ischemic heart disease, stroke and diabetes Early detection of hypertension, which is an important public health problem, is very important in both economically developing and developed countries. That's why we wrote this article to draw attention to prehypertension.

Keywords

Prehypertension, comorbidity, health problem

Introduction

According to The Seventh Report published in 2003 by the Joint National Committee (JNC 7), patients with systolic blood pressure of 120-139 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of 80-89 mmHg are diagnosed with prehypertension [1]. According to the 2017 American hypertension guideline, the definition of elevated blood pressure is used in patients with systolic blood pressure of 120-129 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <80mmHg [2]. According to the 2018 European guideline, the definition of high normal blood pressure is used in patients with systolic blood pressure of 130-139 mmHg and / or diastolic blood pressure of 85-89mmHg [3].

In a study by Vasan, et al. 30% of patients progressed from prehypertension to hypertension over a 4-year period [4]. Prehypertension often coexists with comorbidities such as ischemic heart disease, stroke and diabetes [5]. Therefore, early detection of hypertension, which is an important public health problem, is very important in both economically developing and developed countries. That's why we wrote this article to draw attention to prehypertension.

Etiology and Progression

Prehypertension has been associated with increased body mass index, increased waist circumference, dyslipidemia, high fasting plasma glucose, smoking, insulin resistance, alcohol consumption and advanced age [5]. Certain factors have been associated with the progression of prehypertension to hypertension. Advanced age, male gender, increased C reactive protein, high salt intake, mongolian race, obesity, family history and increased waist circumference are among these factors [6-8].

Figure 1. POCT categorization by frequency of use of the primary care

Figure 2. Connecting health policy priorities, and enabling factors for POCT dissemination in primary care

Figure 3. Favorable regulatory environment and necessary interventions in the primary care in order to support the dissemination of POCT

General Evaluation

Masked hypertension should be evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with high normal blood pressure, according to the European guideline [3].

According to the American guideline [2], after 3 months of lifestyle change, ambulatory or home blood pressure monitoring is performed if office systolic blood pressure is 120-129 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg. If the blood pressure is 130/80 mmHg and above in this follow-up, masked hypertension is diagnosed. In this case, both lifestyle changes are made and drug treatment is started. If blood pressure is below these values, a lifestyle change is made due to increased blood pressure (high normal blood pressure). In addition, annual ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is performed to determine progression or masked hypertension.

Table 1. Advantages and Disadvantages of POCTs in primary care

Aspects

Advantages

Disadvantages

Role played

in clinical decision making

- Faster decision making

- Possibility of early detection of serious diseases

- Greater certainty in the choice of therapy (e.g., antibiotic prescribing)

- immediate results are not always useful (e.g., monitoring of chronic diseases)

- Reliance on a device impairs medical skills

- Increase in the number of unnecessary tests

Reliability

- Simplifies diagnosis with clinical background support

- Less reliable than a traditional lab test

- Positive results can be misleading

Impact

on work processes

- Reduces specialist doctor-patient appointments with on-the-spot testing

- Reduce the burden on laboratories with a lack of capacity

- increased testing volume can put a strain on primary care staff

- Reporting errors may occur without an automatic online connection

Impact on physician-patient collaboration and on patient satisfaction

- Facilitates communication between the parties

- Better recognition of the service provider's work

- Increased therapeutic adherence, participation in diagnosis

- Strengthen the acceptance of non / minimally invasive tests

 

Impact

on costs

and quality

of care

 

- Worse scale economies, higher average costs compared to central laboratory tests

- Uncertainties regarding financing

- Insufficient practice and trust in POCT tools on quality assurance issues

- Lack of authority / competence to apply new POCT tools

Treatment

Non-pharmacological approaches are recommended for all patients with prehypertension, as lifestyle changes such as weight loss, reduction of salt consumption and increased physical activity effectively reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. In patients with prehypertension, a reassessment is made 3-6 after lifestyle changes [3]. A meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials showed that the risk of stroke and major cardiovascular events was reduced with antihypertensive therapy in patients with high normal blood pressure in high and very high risk patients [3].

Pharmacological therapy is recommended in patients with high normal blood pressure with diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, or coronary artery disease with a class 2b indication according to the 2018 European guidelines [3]. In the TROPHY and PHARAO studies, pharmacological therapy has been shown to significantly reduce the development of hypertension in prehypertensive patients [9]. Drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in prehypertensive patients are the most promising group [10]. In addition, in a study conducted with prehypertensive patients, the use of low-dose diuretics provided optimal blood pressure.

References

  1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, et al. (2003) Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 42: 1206-1252. [Crossref]
  2. Carey RM, Calhoun DA, Bakris GL, Brook RD, Daugherty SL, et al. (2018) Resistant hypertension: detection, evaluation and management, A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 72: e53-e90. [Crossref]
  3. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, et al. (2018) 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J 1: 1–98. [Crossref]
  4. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Kannel WB, Levy D (2001) Assessment of frequency of progression to hypertension in nonhypertensive participants in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet 358: 1682-1686. [Crossref]
  5. Erem C, Hacihasanoglu A, Kocak M, Deger O, Topbas M (2009) Prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension and associated risk factors among Turkish adults: Trabzon Hypertension Study. J Public Health (Oxf) 31: 47-58. [Crossref]
  6. Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Panagiotakos DB, Lentzas Y, Stefanadis C (2008) Abdominal obesity and inflammation predicts hypertension among prehypertensive men and women: the ATTICA Study. Heart Vessels 23: 96-103. [Crossref]
  7. De Marco M, de Simone G, Roman MJ, Chinali M, Lee ET, et al. (2009) Cardiovascular and metabolic predictors of progression of prehypertension into hypertension: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 54: 974-980. [Crossref]
  8. Zheng L, Sun Z, Zhang X, Xu C, Li J, et al. (2010) Predictors of progression from prehypertension to hypertension among rural Chinese adults: results from Liaoning Province. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 17: 217-222. [Crossref]
  9. Pimenta E, Oparil S (2010) Prehypertension: epidemiology, consequences and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol 6: 21-30. [Crossref]
  10. Fuchs FD, Fuchs SC, Poli-de-Figueiredo CE, Figueiredo Neto JA, Scala LCN, et al. (2018) Effectiveness of low-dose diuretics for blood pressure reduction to optimal values in prehypertension: a randomized clinical trial. J Hypertens 36: 933-938. [Crossref]

Editorial Information

Editor-in-Chief

Kohei Akazawa
Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Japan

Article Type

Mini Review

Publication history

Received date: November 12, 2020
Accepted date: December 17, 2020
Published date: December 21, 2020

Copyright

©2020 Coşgun MS. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Coşgun MS, Değirmenci H, Bakırcı EM, Ölmez H (2020) Prehypertension. Health Prim Car 4: doi: 10.15761/HPC.1000202

Corresponding author

Hüsnü Değirmenci

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.

E-mail : bhuvaneswari.bibleraaj@uhsm.nhs.uk

Figure 1. POCT categorization by frequency of use of the primary care

Figure 2. Connecting health policy priorities, and enabling factors for POCT dissemination in primary care

Figure 3. Favorable regulatory environment and necessary interventions in the primary care in order to support the dissemination of POCT

Table 1. Advantages and Disadvantages of POCTs in primary care

Aspects

Advantages

Disadvantages

Role played

in clinical decision making

- Faster decision making

- Possibility of early detection of serious diseases

- Greater certainty in the choice of therapy (e.g., antibiotic prescribing)

- immediate results are not always useful (e.g., monitoring of chronic diseases)

- Reliance on a device impairs medical skills

- Increase in the number of unnecessary tests

Reliability

- Simplifies diagnosis with clinical background support

- Less reliable than a traditional lab test

- Positive results can be misleading

Impact

on work processes

- Reduces specialist doctor-patient appointments with on-the-spot testing

- Reduce the burden on laboratories with a lack of capacity

- increased testing volume can put a strain on primary care staff

- Reporting errors may occur without an automatic online connection

Impact on physician-patient collaboration and on patient satisfaction

- Facilitates communication between the parties

- Better recognition of the service provider's work

- Increased therapeutic adherence, participation in diagnosis

- Strengthen the acceptance of non / minimally invasive tests

 

Impact

on costs

and quality

of care

 

- Worse scale economies, higher average costs compared to central laboratory tests

- Uncertainties regarding financing

- Insufficient practice and trust in POCT tools on quality assurance issues

- Lack of authority / competence to apply new POCT tools