Take a look at the Recent articles

Effect of blood transfusion on central venous oxygen saturation in anemic patients on intensive care unit

Abd-Elsalm WM

Department of anesthesia and surgical intensive care, Kafr Elsheikh University faculty of Medicine, Egypt

E-mail : aa

Elbradie GF

Department of anesthesia and surgical intensive care, Tanta University faculty of Medicine, Egypt

El-Shehdawy SR

Department of anesthesia and surgical intensive care, Tanta University faculty of Medicine, Egypt

Soliman SM

Department of anesthesia and surgical intensive care, Tanta University faculty of Medicine, Egypt

DOI: 10.15761/JCIS.1000117

Article
Article Info
Author Info
Figures & Data

Abstract

Introduction: Anemia is a major problem in Intensive care units (ICU). Many patients are exposed to anemia during their stay in ICU. Many factors contribute to anemia such as repeated phelipotmies, associated chronic health problems, the devastating disease that admits the patient to ICU, sepsis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of blood transfusion on SVO2 in anemic patients in intensive care units and the possibility of using it as a guide for blood transfusion in ICU.

Methods: This study was carried out in Tanta University Hospitals in surgical intensive care unit for one year on critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients with anemia (Hb < 7g/dl). Forty patients were included in the study. Patients were divided retrospective into two groups according to central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) before blood transfusion; Group A: ScvO2 equal or more than 70%.and Group B: ScvO2 less than 70%. Then 15 min after completion of the transfusion, similar sample was taken, and the blood gas analysis was repeated.

Results: As regard hemoglobin and hematocrit value, blood transfusion provided a significant and approximately similar increase for all patients in both groups. There was no significant difference as regard heart rate, central venous pressure, MAP, SaO2 and lactate in the two groups before and after blood transfusion.

Conclusions: Central venous oxygen saturation can be used as adjuvant clinical tool for blood transfusion.

Keywords

Blood transfusion; Anemia; Central oxygen saturation.

Introduction

Anemia is a major problem in Intensive care units (ICU). Many patients are exposed to anemia during their stay in ICU. Many factors contribute to anemia such as repeated phelipotmies, associated chronic health problems, the devastating disease that admits the patient to ICU, sepsis [1, 2].

Blood transfusion is used with commonly in ICU to treat anemia. And it is associated with lethal side effects such as transmission of blood born infection like HIV and HCV. Transfusion overload, Transfusion related acute lung injury and Anaphylactic shock [3,4].

The decision to transfuse blood should not base solely on hemoglobin level. It should also integrate other factors such as the clinical condition of the patient and central venous oxygen saturation [5].

Central venous oxygen saturation is considered as a clinical tool for whole body oxygen uptake-delivery relationship. It is difficult and carries a lot of complications, to insert pulmonary artery catheter to measure mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), the central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) is increasingly being used as a reasonably accurate surrogate [6].

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are simpler to insert, and generally safer and cheaper than PACs. The CVC allows sampling of blood for measurement of ScvO2. The normal range for SvO2 is 68 to 77% and ScvO2 is 5% above these values [7, 8].

Oxygen extraction ratio is increased as compensatory mechanism during anemia. In normal people, oxygen extraction is normally not exceeding 25%. The O2 extraction ratio (ER), which is the ratio of whole-body O2 consumption to O2 delivery, approaches 50 percent when the limits of compensation are reached. Oxygen extraction is recently used as adjuvant factor in blood transfusion decision. central venous oxygen saturation is considered to be alternative for Oxygen extraction ratio as a guide for blood transfusion [6, 9].

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of blood transfusion on SVO2 in anemic patients in intensive care units. And the possibility of using it as a guide for blood transfusion in ICU.

Patients and methods

This study was carried out in Tanta University Hospitals in surgical intensive care unit for one year on critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients with anemia (Hb < 7g/dl). Forty patients were included in the study

Study setting and population

We include all adult Patients aged above 18 years, Patients with Hb < 7g/dl, Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mm Hg. and their urine output ≥ 0.5 ml/kg/hr. we exclude all patients with increased oxygen consumption (shivering, epilepsy, pain), Ongoing hemorrhage, Shock of any origin and any patient on vasopressor support, Chronic anemia, Hypoxemia, and Patients with ischemic heart disease, acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.

Study protocol

This study was carried out on anemic patients (hemoglobin <7g/dl) who need blood transfusion according to French recommendation of blood transfusion using threshold values for hemoglobin together with the clinical context to indicate blood transfusion. Central venous blood samples were taken and a blood gas analysis immediately before blood transfusion was undertaken. Patients were divided retrospective into two groups according to central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) before blood transfusion; Group A: ScvO2 equal or more than 70%.and Group B: ScvO2 less than 70%. Then 15 min after completion of the transfusion, similar sample was taken, and the blood gas analysis was repeated. Then we compared central venous oxygen saturation before and after transfusion. If a patient received more than 1 unit of packed cells, central venous oxygen saturation will be recorded before the first unit and 15 min after completion of the last unit. The following measurements were recorded before and 15 min after transfusion:1-Hemoglobin level (mg/dl).2- Haematocrite level (%).3-Central venous pressure (cmH2O).4- Heart rate (b/min). 5-Mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg). 6-SaO2 (arterial oxygen saturation) (%). 7-Serum lactate (mmol/L).

Results

In this study the mean of the age in group A was 43.330 ±13.089 y and it was similar in the other group with mean of 46.390 ±10.300 y. The males were more predominant in the two groups with 58.3% in group A and 60.7% in group B.

As regard hemoglobin and hematocrit value, blood transfusion provided a significant and approximately similar increase for all patients in both groups. (Table 1)

Table 1. ScVO2 = Central venous oxygen saturation. Hg = hemoglobin. Htc= hematocrit.  CVP=central venous pressure. SaO2=Arterial oxygen saturation MAP=mean arterial pressure

Group A

Group B

Age Mean ± Sd

43.33 ± 13.089

46.39 ± 10.3

Sex

   Male

58.30%

60.70%

   Female

41.30%

39.30%

ScVO2 BEFORE TRANSFUSION Mean ± SD

79.958 ± 2.472

59.946 ± 3.598

ScVO2 AFTER TRANSFUSION Mean ± SD

81.458 ± 1.096

74.017 ± 2.565

P Value

0.106

 0.0000 *

Hb Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

6.158 ± 0.308

5.939 ± 0.508

Hb After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

7.442 ± 0.276

7.507 ± 0.338

P Value

0.000 *

0.0000 *

Htc Before Transfusion  

19.083 ± 0.9

18.607 ± 1.03

Htc After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

24.75 ± 0.866

23.928 ± 0.94

P Value

0.000 *

0.000*

CVP Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

8.666 ± 1.45

8.071 ± 1.412

CVP After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

9.166 ± 1.527

8.321± 0.818

P Value

0.4

0.282

HR Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

79.5 ±11.508

81.892 ±8.642

HR After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

78.832 ±9.058

80.035 ± 8.324

P Value

0.176

0.372

MAP Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

79.500 ±11.508

74.570 ± 7.461

MAP After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

78.832 ± 9.059

75.000 ± 6.543

P Value

0.176

0.554

SaO2 Before   Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

98.416 ±1.083

97.357 ±1.311

SaO2 After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

98.583 ±0.792

97.535 ± 1.137

P Value

0.504

0.605

Lactate Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

0.783 ± 0.216

0.907 ± 0.307

Lactate After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

0.817 ± 0.019

0.817 ± 0.311

P Value

0.586

0.057

There was no significant difference as regard heart rate, central venous pressure, MAP, SaO2 and lactate in the two groups before and after blood transfusion.

In group B there was significant increase in ScvO2 and significant decrease in O2 extraction after blood transfusion while there was no significant difference in both in group A.

Discussion

Blood transfusion is a common practice in Intensive Care Units. In this study, blood transfusion lead to significant increase in ScVO2 when it was < 70% before transfusion.

In agreement with our study Mung’ayi et al. who found that there was no significant increase in ScvO2 after blood transfusion in patients with Oxygen extraction less than 30% i.e. ScvO2 ≥ 70% and majority of patients (60.3%) who were transfused did not physiologically require RBC transfusion and did not benefit from increased oxygen content [10].

Also, in agreement with our study, Adamczyk et al. enrolled 60 hemodynamically stable patients in their study. ScvO2 (%) and hemoglobin (g/dl) were measured before and after blood transfusion. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups according to ScvO2 measured before blood transfusion (< or > 70%). Following blood transfusion, the ScvO2 increased significantly (from 57.8 to 68.5%) in the group with initial ScvO2 less than 70% whereas it was unchanged in patients with initial ScvO2 greater or equal 70% (from 76.8 to 76.5%).They recommend that ScvO2 could be a relevant biological parameter to complete the current guidelines for blood transfusion in stable patient with a central venous catheter during the postoperative period [9].

In agreement with our study, Orlov et al. proved that O2 extraction does not significantly change after blood transfusion if the base line was normal. Also, they found that many RBC transfusions in anemic patients took place in the setting of a normal O2ER, and temporal differences in O2ER after RBC transfusions were found to vary as a function of pre-transfusion O2ER. Specifically, more than 40 percent of RBC transfusions given solely for low Hb concentration were in patients whose pre-transfusion O2ER was normal and post-transfusion O2ER decreased in patients with elevated pre-transfusion O2ER [11].

In agreement with our study, Sehgal et al. demonstrated that using O2 Extraction as a transfusion trigger could potentially reduce the number of blood transfusion. They showed that if they had used O2 Extraction of 0.50 as a transfusion trigger, then only 7 out of 41 patients in the transfusion group would have been transfused. Also suggest that using O2 extraction along with some other clinical risk factors as preoperative ejection fraction , age ,body surface area and recent clinical history as a part of transfusion algorithm and with conjugation with blood conservative measures can reduce blood transfusion [12].

Adamczyk et al. and Rivers et al. concluded that ScvO2 could be an important parameter guiding transfusion decisions in patients with severe sepsis or in stable high-risk patients equipped with CVC, and that ScvO2 can be proposed as universal physiological transfusion trigger [9,13].

O’Farrell conducted a pilot study in 2006 that measured the relationship between O2ER and postoperative RBC transfusions in cardiac surgery and concluded that elevated O2ER may be a more appropriate transfusion trigger than low hemoglobin concentration and its use may reduce inappropriate transfusion [14].

On contrary to our study, in 2014 Fiser et al. investigated the effect of RBC transfusion in 45 pediatric patients with ECMO and found that transfusion did not significantly alter global tissue oxygenation. In this study, most transfusions were given when the patient did not appear to be oxygen delivery dependent. Thus, Fiser et al. recommended other studies to investigate the effects of blood transfusion in decreasing pretransfusion O2 extraction [10].

Limitation of the study

The study was single center study; also, the small number of patients due to exclusion criteria of the study.

Conclusion

Central venous oxygen saturation can be used as adjuvant clinical tool for blood transfusion.

Authorship

Sohair Soliman, Ghada Elbradie, Sameh Elshehdawy, Wafaa Abdelsalam were behind the idea of the research, collected the data of the patients and follow up the patients in the Intensive Care Unit. Sohair Mostafa Soliman did the statistics. Ghada Fouad Elbradie and Wafaa Abdelsalam wrote the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Mohamed G. Elbahnasawy and Dr Sherief Abd-Esalam for their kind support.

Funding

2021 Copyright OAT. All rights reserv

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Informed consent

Written Informed consent was obtained from every patient or their relative participate in the study. The patient or his relative received an explanation on the purpose of the study and patient had a secret code number to ensure privacy to participants and confidentiality of the data.

The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected in a priori approval by the institution's human research committee.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from ethical committee of Tanta University Faculty of Medicine before the start of the research.

Human rights

The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975. Declaration of Helsinki as reflected in a priori approval by the institution's human research committee.

References

  1. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, Fink MP, Levy MM, et al. (2004) The CRIT Study: anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill—current clinical practice in the United States. Critical care medicine. 32:39-52.
  2. Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M, Bilò MB, Brockow K, et al. (2014) Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.Allergy69: 1026-1045. [Crossref]
  3. Benson AB, Moss M, Silliman CC (2009) Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI): a clinical review with emphasis on the critically ill. Br J Haematol 147:431-443. [Crossref]
  4. Bolton-Maggs PH, Cohen H (2013) Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) haemovigilance and progress is improving transfusion safety. Br J Haematol 163:303-314. [Crossref]
  5. Paone G, Silverman NA (1997) The paradox of on-bypass transfusion thresholds in blood conservation. Circulation 96(9 Suppl):II-205-8; discussion II-9.
  6. Dueck MH1, Klimek M, Appenrodt S, Weigand C, Boerner U (2005) Trends but not individual values of central venous oxygen saturation agree with mixed venous oxygen saturation during varying hemodynamic conditions.Anesthesiology103: 249-257. [Crossref]
  7. Vallet B, Tavernier B, Lund N (2000) Assessment of tissue oxygenation in the critically-ill.Eur J Anaesthesiol17: 221-229. [Crossref]
  8. Vallet B, Robin E, Lebuffe G (2010) Venous oxygen saturation as a physiologic transfusion trigger. Critical care (London, England). 14:213.
  9. Adamczyk S, Robin E, Barreau O, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, et al. (2009) Contribution of central venous oxygen saturation in postoperative blood transfusion decision. Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation; 2009.
  10. Mung’ayi V, Sharif T, Odaba DS (2014) Blood transfusion and oxygen extraction ratio in patients admitted to the general intensive care unit: A quasi experimental study. Afr J Emerg Med 4:66-70.
  11. Orlov D, O'Farrell R, McCluskey SA, Carroll J, Poonawala H, et al. (2009) The clinical utility of an index of global oxygenation for guiding red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery.Transfusion49: 682-688. [Crossref]
  12. Sehgal LR, Zebala LP, Takagi I, Curran RD, Votapka TV, et al. (2001) Evaluation of oxygen extraction ratio as a physiologic transfusion trigger in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.Transfusion41: 591-595. [Crossref]
  13. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, et al. (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.N Engl J Med345: 1368-1377. [Crossref]
  14. O’Farrell R, Ghannam M, McCluskey M, Beattie S, Karkouti K (2006) Oxygen extraction ratio (OER) and blood transfusion in cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth 53:26342-

Editorial Information

Editor-in-Chief

Tomoko Hasunuma
Kitasato University School of Medicine

Article Type

Research Article

Publication history

Received date: November 30, 2018
Accepted date: December 12, 2018
Published date: December 17, 2018

Copyright

©2018 Abd-Elsalm WM. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Abd-Elsalm WM (2018) Effect of blood transfusion on central venous oxygen saturation in anemic patients on intensive care unit. J Clin Invest Stud 1: DOI: 10.15761/JCIS.1000117

Corresponding author

Wafaa M Abd-Elsalam

Department of anesthesia and surgical intensive care, Kafr Elsheikh University faculty of Medicine, Egypt.

Table 1. ScVO2 = Central venous oxygen saturation. Hg = hemoglobin. Htc= hematocrit.  CVP=central venous pressure. SaO2=Arterial oxygen saturation MAP=mean arterial pressure

Group A

Group B

Age Mean ± Sd

43.33 ± 13.089

46.39 ± 10.3

Sex

   Male

58.30%

60.70%

   Female

41.30%

39.30%

ScVO2 BEFORE TRANSFUSION Mean ± SD

79.958 ± 2.472

59.946 ± 3.598

ScVO2 AFTER TRANSFUSION Mean ± SD

81.458 ± 1.096

74.017 ± 2.565

P Value

0.106

 0.0000 *

Hb Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

6.158 ± 0.308

5.939 ± 0.508

Hb After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

7.442 ± 0.276

7.507 ± 0.338

P Value

0.000 *

0.0000 *

Htc Before Transfusion  

19.083 ± 0.9

18.607 ± 1.03

Htc After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

24.75 ± 0.866

23.928 ± 0.94

P Value

0.000 *

0.000*

CVP Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

8.666 ± 1.45

8.071 ± 1.412

CVP After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

9.166 ± 1.527

8.321± 0.818

P Value

0.4

0.282

HR Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

79.5 ±11.508

81.892 ±8.642

HR After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

78.832 ±9.058

80.035 ± 8.324

P Value

0.176

0.372

MAP Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

79.500 ±11.508

74.570 ± 7.461

MAP After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

78.832 ± 9.059

75.000 ± 6.543

P Value

0.176

0.554

SaO2 Before   Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

98.416 ±1.083

97.357 ±1.311

SaO2 After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

98.583 ±0.792

97.535 ± 1.137

P Value

0.504

0.605

Lactate Before Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

0.783 ± 0.216

0.907 ± 0.307

Lactate After Transfusion   Mean ± Sd

0.817 ± 0.019

0.817 ± 0.311

P Value

0.586

0.057